Gay Marriage Ban Eats Dust

For nowFor now at least. It's nice to wake up to news like this. Doesn't happen often. I think it's cute that people want to officially and legally "define marriage as between a man and a woman." Seems like a neat way to have fun with the Constitution. So I was thinking maybe there's some other stuff we could define into the Constitution. Some suggestions:Bigot: a person so insecure he or she must demonize an entire category of people in order to create the illusion that someone is below him/herFundamentalist: one whose need to believe in the inherent simplicity of life outweighs the countervailing tugs of Reason, Truth and EvidenceDemagogue: Demagogue

Previous
Previous

Breast Feed or Else?

Next
Next

Year's Best SF now available